Friday, 19 June 2009
Such Fallow Fellows
Sunday, 26 April 2009
Lights, Camera ... Fiction?
There’s a good deal in Scripture about how we appear on the outside and what we are on the inside. Samuel is given the unenviable task of recruiting a king (1 Sam 16) but not before God reminds him of the job description. Personal qualities are essential. Brad Pitt lookalike not required. Jesus has some scathing words for religious types with shiny faces like whitewashed tombs and minds that rattle like bones (Matt 23:27). God has simple expectations – reality and appearances should match. The word for this has an old fashioned ring to it these days – ‘integrity’, which comes from the same root as ‘integrate’ and carries much the same meaning. Christians should be integrated people; our inner and outer lives in balance.
Of course, the point of doctoring photos to remove the wrinkles is to avoid people seeing us as we really are. Hypocrisy wouldn’t be tempting if we weren’t convinced there was an advantage to making others think we’re wiser, richer, sexier, holier, more beautiful or less ordinary. But, perhaps we should learn something from our own photographs. They give away more than we realize. We can focus on our ‘best points’ but somehow something in an expression or the way light and shadow falls across a face will tell the real story. ‘Keeping up appearances’ may make a good sitcom but it’s a rotten way to live a life.
Friday, 24 April 2009
Depression and Creativity
I don't know how this squares with the supposed association between melancholy and artistic achievement. The two do seem connected but so much pseudo-scientific waffle comes from people who don't know the internal world of depression. My experience is that when I'm depressed I achieve very little. Depression is a cheat, a liar and an imposter which doesn't deserve respect as the companion of 'troubled poets'.
Friday, 3 April 2009
Is the Crisis 'Economic'?
Thursday, 19 March 2009
What is church?
Of course an argument from analogy should be treated with some caution. If Matt 5:27,28 asserts a kind of equivalance between committing adultery and thinking about it does it then follow (by analogy) that merely planning a new church is in itself 'church' - a kind of 'church of the mind'? In my view such a disembodied notion of 'church' is a step too far, although similar issues are raised by the existence of internet 'churches'. Arguments from analogy are hardly likely to take the heat out of the 'what is church' debate. When a person becomes a person is more fiercely controversial, even than the question of what constitutes a Christian church. I would tentatively suggest however, that worries about the need for 'proper' ministry and sacraments in newly planted congregations may be more to do with the insecurities of established churches than whether two or three gathered in the name of Christ are an infant church or something else.
Wednesday, 18 March 2009
Mennonites in Liverpool?
this one of those myths like the Yeti or the Loch Ness Monster or is there some truth to the rumour? If there are Mennonites in Liverpool it would be appropriate. The last time Menno's folk passed through the port in any numbers was on their way to North America from Russia more than a hundred years ago. If you've heard anything about the Liverpool connection I would love to hear from you.
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
Anger with the church
I enjoy reading Thomas Merton but wonder whether it's revealing that arguably the most famous Christian monk of the 20th Century ended up in a hermitage. I believe in Christian Community but recognize why so many believers end up refugees from corporate Christian commitment. Christian organizations - sometimes rather dismissively called para-church organizations - generate similar outcomes. There are many reasons for this but here's a few that occur to me:
1) Dressing up power as something else. All organizations involve the exercise of power but it's sometimes seen as too 'unspiritual' a word for Christians to acknowledge. Sometimes too, there's a reluctance to admit to hidden agendas and vested interests. This isn't honest and it gets in the way of transparency and accountability in decision-making.
2) Failures in communication. It sounds basic but a good deal of pain could be avoided by ensuring that we actually talk to one another. This is about listening to other points of view but it's also about ensuring that processes (for example disciplinary processes) don't lock people out of the conversation. Excessive secrecy is the kiss of death for good corporate process.
3) Recognizing the impact of decline. Decline obviously has an impact on numbers but it's also deeply discouraging. That discouragement can lead to fatalism and deepen exhaustion amongst deeply committed staff and volunteers. It's all too easy for churches and Christian organizations to cast around for scapegoats - especially leaders - who are probably already overworked.
I would be glad of a conversation about this. Why was that 'anger with the church' workshop so well attended?